George Lloyd: Symphony No. 3 in F for Orchestra - Conductor's Score & Parts [Printed Music for Hire]

£0.00
Out of stock
Catalogue Number
SRMP0006

Conductor's Score and Parts

Duration: 24 mintues

TO HIRE THIS PRODUCT PLEASE CONTACT NIMBUS MUSIC PUBLISHING

Tel: (+44) 1600 890 007   Email: publishing@wyastone.co.uk

 

A study score is also available to purchase [SRMP0005 - click here]

A recording of this work is available on CD [SRCD2417 - click here]

 

Lloyd became a symphonist despite himself. When he was in his twenties he seemed destined to be a composer of operas and it is likely that, had the vicissitudes of war not intervened, he would have written music for the stage exclusively. In an article for the June 1939 issue of the Musical Monthly Record, Harry Farjeon wondered why music for Lloyd was ‘not centred in the concert hall but in the theatre’ and quoted the young composer as being ‘interested only in opera’. There are strong traces in the symphonies of what might have been: the intensely lyrical, cantabile nature of the writing; the intermezzo-like movements; the opera buffa qualities of the finales and the feeling for the long line which runs through those supple and sweeping melodies all denote a born opera composer. In the event his operatic aspirations were cruelly cut short and it is to his courageous, life-affirming twelve symphonies that we must look to chart his development, recovery and eventual triumph.

Manufacturer: Wyastone Estate Limited, Wyastone Leys, Monmouth, NP25 3SR
Email: sales@wyastone.co.uk

Reviews:


"In Lloyd's music, one can experience the existential, traumatic experiences and the longing for redemption and transcendence at every turn. And one immediately understands that he must have been a born opera composer (his three operas will be released in the Lyrita edition): melodically as catchy as they are distinctive, rhythmically extremely vibrant, and consistently captivating in its events characterized by strong contrasts. While these events do not unfold in contradiction to purely musical laws, they follow an almost tangible plot that, in its surprising and extremely effective twists and turns, enthralls the listener like a thrilling film. The expressive range extends from capriciously lively scherzos (flirting with "light music") to the most intimate lyricism and on to the catastrophic.

Lloyd has amalgamated the entire tradition and transformed the simple and the complex into something unmistakably his own. He constructs his large-scale forms with a sure hand, and except in the first symphony, there is no schematic approach and no dullness. The orchestration is of magnificent power, delicacy, and versatility (one has to invoke names like Tchaikovsky or Rachmaninoff to make suitable comparisons). For beginners, I would recommend works such as the vehement first piano concerto, the transfigured cello concerto, the profoundly visionary John Donne cantata "A Litany," and, of course, all the mature symphonies. The second violin concerto (with strings) and the piano and chamber music are also wonderful. There are no shortcomings, even though around 1970 he went through a phase that tended more towards factual brevity! As a symphonist, Lloyd reaches a solitary peak in the tragic Seventh Symphony (1957-59). With "H. M. S. Trinidad," he wrote one of the most magnificent marches in history. And when, at the end of the monumental "Symphonic Mass," the solo trumpet, in an improvisationally liberating manner, winds its farewell around the vocal line, we are all simply moved. George Lloyd is a great discovery!” Christoph Schlüren, Fono Forum

 


Last Saturday I had the pleasure of attending a thrilling performance of George Lloyd’s Fourth Symphony, by the Ealing Symphony Orchestra. The venue was packed, and the audience gave the work an ecstatic reception. It had been 37 years since the piece was last heard in public; I trust it won't be another 37 years before it is heard again. Yet, once the excitement had faded, one was left with a depressing thought: it remains tiresomely difficult for contemporary British composers to command performances of works with popular appeal. Lloyd, who died in 1998 aged 85, is not the only example. I have been listening recently to music by Ian Venables, 63, who has been composing for decades and has a devoted following. Venables, a miniaturist, writes exquisite chamber music in the English style of Howells or Ireland; he has been acclaimed by independent minded critics as the finest writer of art songs since Gerald Finzi.

His works which have instant charm for intelligent listeners while being intensely musical, are preformed rarely in the great temples of changer music such as the Wigmore Hall or the Purcell Room. Nor are they broadcast frequently on the main classical music stations. He delights audiences in the provinces- there was a recent concert in Luton- while metropolitan taste is deemed different (an interesting contention) and Venables is frozen out. His works, which have instant charm for intelligent listeners while being intensely musical, are preformed rarely in the great temples of chamber music such as the Wigmore Hall or the Purcell Room. Nor are they broadcast frequently on the main classical music stations. He delights audiences in the provinces- there was a recent concert in Luton- while metropolitan taste is deemed different (an interesting contention) and Venables is frozen out.

The two Venables CDs I have been listening to lately are immensely rewarding. The first, The Song of Severn (Signum Classics), includes two song cycles and nine other songs. Britain’s greatest living baritone, Roderick Williams, sings them. Venables sets to music verse by often forgotten poets, from John Clare to John Masefield; to hear them is to hear something reflective, brooding, melancholy and unmistakably English. Occasionally he makes me think of Vaughan Williams; they share a knack for presenting a new song that, on first hearing, sounds asa though one has known it all one’s life.

The second CD (Somm) featuring Venable’s Piano Quintet and other chamber works for violin, viola, cello, and piano, is a revelation. Played by the Coull Quartet with the pianist Mark Bebbington, the Quintet was written in 1995 and premiered the following gear at the Malvern Festival (Venables, a Liverpudlian by birth, has lived in Worcestershire since the Eighties.) It is an exceptional work with many shifts of tone and varieties of expression, and if Venable’s excellence could be symbolised by just one piece, it would be this. Again, it proves that composers can be original without being dissonant or unappealing. Most recently, Venables has set the verse of five Great War poets in a new song cycle, Through These Pale Cold Days. It will have its premiere in Worcester this autumn and be recorded next year; both should be regarded as events of national importance in our musical culture.

Sadly, the people who mostly shape musical opinion these days will afford it no such recognition. They are too deeply embedded in the cult of the composer who, often in receipt of public subsidy, writes music of limited ability and massive self-indulgence, that seeks no audience outside a circle of like-minded introspectives.

George Lloyd had to wait until his 70s to win recognition as a composer because the musical establishment ridiculed and rejected a man whose only crime was to write music in romantic tradition, with he did because he like dit and his public liked it: and in the end public demand forced performances of his work. Lloyd’s day will come again- indeed, is coming. So will Venable’s. That he remains a minority taste in the musical world is the fault of an establishment that awaits its emperor’s new clothes moment. Let us hope that moment comes before its fatuous attitudes destroy classical music’s audience once and for all, and while Venables- unlike Lloyd- is still around to enjoy the success his talent merits. This piece originally appeared in the Telegraph, 26 May 2018 


 

© 2010-2026 Wyastone. All Rights Reserved.